A $1.7 billion contract awarded by the New Jersey Turnpike Authority (NJTA) to TransCore, a company allegedly linked to China, has sparked an outcry among federal lawmakers and state officials. Critics are raising concerns over the decision to bypass an American company in favor of a firm that some claim may have ties to the Chinese Communist Party.
The situation has prompted calls for investigations into national security risks and demands for transparency regarding the decision-making process behind the deal.
The Deal and the Controversy Surrounding TransCore
In 2024, the New Jersey Turnpike Authority awarded a $1.73 billion contract to TransCore for managing the E-ZPass system. TransCore, a company based in the U.S., was selected despite an offer from the Newark-based competitor, Conduent, being $251 million lower.
This raised immediate red flags, particularly since TransCore’s business operations and ownership are allegedly linked to firms with ties to China.
TransCore’s global business dealings have fueled speculation about its connections to Chinese entities, which has caught the attention of federal lawmakers concerned about potential national security risks.
Federal Lawmakers Voice Concerns Over National Security
U.S. Rep. Josh Gottheimer, D-N.J. (5th District), has added his voice to the growing chorus of skepticism surrounding the deal. He sent a formal letter to the New Jersey Turnpike Authority questioning why an American company, Conduent, which made a lower bid, was overlooked in favor of TransCore.
Gottheimer joins U.S. Rep. Jeff Van Drew, R-N.J. (2nd District), in calling for greater scrutiny of the deal.
Van Drew has been particularly vocal, urging U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy to investigate any possible links between TransCore and the Chinese Communist Party.
“This deal raises questions about the potential security implications of allowing a foreign company with possible Chinese connections to manage critical infrastructure,” Van Drew said.
His stance has been echoed by several state lawmakers who are worried about the broader implications of the deal, particularly on national security.
TransCore’s Background: Ties to China and National Security Concerns
TransCore is part of the larger global conglomerate, Roper Technologies, which has significant business operations in China. While TransCore itself is a U.S.-based company, its international ties to Chinese businesses have raised alarms about its independence from Chinese influence.
Experts have warned that any company with such connections could be a potential security risk, especially when it comes to managing sensitive infrastructure like the E-ZPass system, which collects data from millions of commuters every day.
The national security concern is twofold: first, there are fears that sensitive data from U.S. citizens could be accessed by foreign entities; second, there is worry about the potential for espionage or sabotage.
The E-ZPass system is vital for toll collection across several states, and any compromise of the system could lead to disruptions in daily operations, potentially affecting millions of drivers.
Conduent’s Protest: A Call for Fair Competition
Conduent, the Newark-based competitor that lost out on the NJTA contract, filed a formal protest in October 2024, citing concerns over the awarding process. Conduent’s bid was significantly lower, which raised questions about the fairness of the selection process.
By bypassing Conduent’s more affordable offer in favor of TransCore’s higher-priced contract, some lawmakers and analysts argue that the NJTA may have overlooked a cost-effective solution in favor of a deal that potentially exposes the state to national security risks.
Conduent’s protest has yet to be resolved, and the New Jersey Turnpike Authority has refrained from commenting on the situation while the protest is ongoing. In a statement to New Jersey 101.5, Turnpike spokesman Thomas Feeney said, “We are unable to comment on the specifics of the protest as it is still under review.”
Public Concerns and Calls for Transparency
The controversy surrounding the NJTA’s decision has sparked a larger conversation about transparency in government contracting. Many state and federal officials are calling for more transparency in the process, with several demanding that the full details of the contract be made public.
Critics argue that taxpayers have the right to know why their money is being spent in ways that may have serious security implications.
In the wake of these concerns, the New Jersey Turnpike Authority is under increased pressure to justify its decision to award the contract to TransCore. Lawmakers like Rep.
Van Drew have called for further investigations into TransCore’s links to China, with many asking whether the deal was in the best interest of New Jersey residents and taxpayers.
National Security Implications of Foreign Ties in U.S. Infrastructure
The controversy over the NJ Turnpike’s $1.7 billion deal has brought attention to the broader issue of foreign involvement in U.S. infrastructure.
As concerns over national security continue to grow, lawmakers are becoming increasingly vigilant about allowing foreign companies, especially those with ties to countries like China, to manage critical systems.
The issue raises several questions: How much foreign influence is acceptable in U.S. infrastructure projects? What steps can be taken to ensure that foreign companies do not have access to sensitive data or systems that could be used for malicious purposes?
These questions are becoming more important as the U.S. becomes increasingly reliant on digital systems for managing its infrastructure.
Conclusion: The Future of the TransCore Deal
As the protest filed by Conduent remains under review, the New Jersey Turnpike Authority must address the growing concerns over the $1.7 billion deal with TransCore. Lawmakers are calling for greater transparency and more thorough investigations into TransCore’s ties to China.
While the NJTA maintains that it cannot comment on the ongoing protest, the controversy surrounding the deal is far from over.
In the coming months, the future of this contract may depend on how much pressure state and federal lawmakers are able to apply on the New Jersey Turnpike Authority. If concerns about national security and transparency are not adequately addressed, the deal may face significant hurdles moving forward.
For more information, you can read about the controversy and the details of the protest at New Jersey 101.5.
Disclaimer – Our team has carefully fact-checked this article to make sure it’s accurate and free from any misinformation. We’re dedicated to keeping our content honest and reliable for our readers.